Navigation
Volunteer
Search
Latest Articles
Related Links
Account
Contribute
Who's Online
We have 5 guests online.
Ad.
Archives
- November 2010 (5)
- October 2010 (58)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (13)
- July 2010 (27)
- June 2010 (13)
- May 2010 (12)
- April 2010 (16)
- March 2010 (12)
- February 2010 (15)
- January 2010 (29)
Commissioner Hood Richardson Keeps a Vigilant Eye on the OLF
Author: Hood Richardson | Published: October 16th, 2010
Publisher's Note: Commissioner Hood Richardson has been an advocate for the property rights of the citizens of rural Northeastern North Carolina in regards to the heavy handed location of an Outlying landing Field (OLF) in this region. We are reminded of this in this press release submitted to Beaufort County Now, by the County Commissioner on September 15, 2010, and presented here below in a correspondence to Admiral John C Harvey in Norfolk, Virginia :
Press Release September 25, 2010
Admiral John C. Harvey, Jr.
Commander US Fleet Forces Command
% Public Affairs Officer
1562 Mitscher Avenue - Suite 250
Norflok, Virginia 23551-2487
RE: OLF Northeast North Carolina
Dear Admiral Harvey:
I continue my objection to the location of an OLF in North Carolina. The two most important issues are: (1) fairness and (2) quantity of land used.
Fairness goes to Virginia municipalities allowing development too close to the two practice fields presently being used at Fentress and Ocieana. Since 1940 the Navy has had ample opportunity to provide
buffer buy outs and the municipalities have had the use of zoning to protect Naval facilities that are important to their local economy. North Carolina has not had the opportunity to participate in any of these development decisions or to benefit economically.
The quantity of land required is large and for the most part is removed from the tax base. There is no opportunity for future development within the buffer. These are huge negative impacts on these small agrarian counties.
These fairness and economic impact factors indicate to me that the OLF should be constructed in Virginia. There is ample land available that is already owned by the Federal Government at the decommissioned Fort Picket site.
Please do not impose this unfair burden on North Carolina.
Sincerely yours,
Hood L. Richardson
Candidate for NC Senate District 1
This article provided courtesy of our sister site: Beaufort County Now
Press Release September 25, 2010
Admiral John C. Harvey, Jr.
Commander US Fleet Forces Command
% Public Affairs Officer
1562 Mitscher Avenue - Suite 250
Norflok, Virginia 23551-2487
RE: OLF Northeast North Carolina
Dear Admiral Harvey:
I continue my objection to the location of an OLF in North Carolina. The two most important issues are: (1) fairness and (2) quantity of land used.
Fairness goes to Virginia municipalities allowing development too close to the two practice fields presently being used at Fentress and Ocieana. Since 1940 the Navy has had ample opportunity to provide
buffer buy outs and the municipalities have had the use of zoning to protect Naval facilities that are important to their local economy. North Carolina has not had the opportunity to participate in any of these development decisions or to benefit economically.
The quantity of land required is large and for the most part is removed from the tax base. There is no opportunity for future development within the buffer. These are huge negative impacts on these small agrarian counties.
These fairness and economic impact factors indicate to me that the OLF should be constructed in Virginia. There is ample land available that is already owned by the Federal Government at the decommissioned Fort Picket site.
Please do not impose this unfair burden on North Carolina.
Sincerely yours,
Hood L. Richardson
Candidate for NC Senate District 1
This article provided courtesy of our sister site: Beaufort County Now
| << Tea Party this Saturday at Washington's Festival Park | Obama protects 2nd Amendment, BCCC offering handgun training >> |
